just wondering. Everyone talks increase the blues deluxe approximately here, but what"s the yes, really difference between this and also the warm rod? i supplied to have actually a 1x12 warm rod i liked pretty well, ns know have a HR deville the im about to unload since it"s as well damned loud- and also im thinking around the blues deluxe. So... What makes it much better or different than the HR deluxe? come on, GAS me up right here boys!


*

The Blues luxurious has much more of a warmer, vintage tone the the hot Rod. The circuit in the blues deluxe is more Bassman inspired. Ns played both once I to be amp shopping and also bought the blues deluxe. The hot Rod ns played sounded as well cold because that my tastes. Both amps require a speaker change though. I still have actually the Eminence speaker in mine Blues luxurious - however will swap in a Celestion as soon as I have actually the cash.

You are watching: Fender blues deluxe vs hot rod deluxe



ya hows this for a third option:

 

*

Get one now prior to they space all gone! Special minimal edition version of Fender"s renowned Hot Rod deluxe amplifier (limited come 800 pieces). Functions vintage white tolex covering, ivory colored regulate knobs, Cyber twin SE grille cloth, a Celestion Century Vintage 12" speaker and also a restricted edition badge. All pipe 40 watts, three selectable networks (normal, drive, and more drive), reverb, impacts loop, footswitch and cover included.


I have a Blues Deluxe, chose it over the warm Rod Deluxe, the warmth of the ton was much more to my taste. The HRD would be far better if you desire to pat rock, I thought it had more crunch.


I have actually a Blues Deluxe, determined it over the hot Rod Deluxe, the warmth of the ton was an ext to mine taste. The HRD would be far better if you desire to play rock, I assumed it had more crunch.

 

 

I agree. I A/B"d these two amps using a CS Strat recently. Desired the Blues Deluxe because that a warmth clean tone. But I do have a DR because that rock.


They room basically the exact same amp. The difference is the the "more drive" circuit from the HRD is absent (thankfully) native the BD. Both space loud sufficient to cracked concrete and the main beef through both of them is that the volume regulate isn"t a control at all. An ext like an on/off switch. The latest 2011? models are an alleged to have actually cured the by utilizing an audio taper pot, however I have not tried one in a while. I had actually a BD because that a long time and liked the tone far better than the HRD. Ns bought the after A/B-ing both of them. However it"s lengthy gone since I got worn down of dicking v the volume. Above about 3 the is too loud for jamming v friends. Below 3 it is sort of useless. If you"re walking to acquire one, make sure it is one with the audio taper.


A friend of mine was reasoning his larger, more heavier modeling amp had actually too countless bells and whistles and also tended come sound sort of cold and harsh therefore he drove down from Duluth and we went amp shopping. We literally make the efforts every tiny amp in the number of stores we visited. The actually finished up obtaining a Blues Jr because he didn"t need one more larger amplifier but both of those amps were the finest sounding small somewhat affordable amps in the entire store which had actually every brand you deserve to think of. Part were smaller and also sounded an excellent for recording but were a little bit spendy and a little too little for his needs.


The two are comparable in some ways and also quite different in others. The noticeable differences room the drive channel and also "more" drive. Both amps are kind of takes on a 59 Bassman according to Fender with the included drive, reverb and also effects loop. That may be a stretch. "Normal" Fenders, such as "black face" and "silver face" Twins, Bandmasters, Bassmans, deluxe Reverbs and the like have actually a get stage, the tone stack (which introduce a the majority of signal loss) and also then a recovery get stage. From there there will be a mixing phase for the channels and reverb and on come the power amp.
In the BD and HRD there room 2 obtain stages preceding the ton stack. This helps produce the blusier preamp breakup similar to a 59 Bassman. The tone stacks are kind of a cross in between a 59 Bassman and a typical Fender. Next comes the journey stage. In the BD it is a quite anemic solitary tube stage. In the HRD both halves the V2 room used. In the BD there is half a tube unused. How much you favor the distortion in one of two people amp is yes, really a issue of taste.
The very first stages are standard Fender except the BD uses a 22uf cathode prejudice cap while the HR provides a bigger 47uf, which will produce a bit much more low end.
Coupling cap next is .01BD Vs .022 in HRD. Quiet a little much more low finish in the HR. The bright switch in the BD is next. This is a non-standard Fender design, which bypasses a 100k resistor with a 750pf cap. As the 100k resistor is attached come the 250k-volume control, that is only efficient in clean mode. The drive regulate in the HR is in between the very first and second stage.
The 2nd stage is unbypassed in both amps. In the HR the bright switch is a .068 cathode bypass cap the is non-functioning in drive mode.
The tone stack complies with the 2nd stage. They room identical except the HR offers a 130k mid steep resistor, when the BD is 100k. This will produce a small less low end in the HR.
The drive regulate precedes the third stage in the BD, a conventional Fender bypassed obtain stage. The 3rd stage is supplied in both clean and also drive in the BD.
In the HR the third and fourth stages are offered in drive only. This pipe is unbypassed. In much more drive a 1uf-bypass lid is switched in ~ above the third stage and also a 22uf bypass cap is switched in ~ above the fourth stage. (The fourth stage is not supplied in the BD, but is simply waiting to be modded in.)
Note ~ above bypassing. The gain in a tube phase is set by 3 components, the plate resistor, (typically 100k in Fenders, bigger for much more gain) the cathode resistor, (typically 1.5k in Fenders, smaller for much more gain) and a bypass cap that bypasses the cathode resistor. The cathode cap is not always used yet when it is, it will certainly increase acquire in different frequency ranges. 22uf will increase gain throughout the entire guitar spectrum. Smaller sized will only raise obtain in greater frequencies.
The master for the drive channel follows in both amps. From over there the amps are virtually identical, other than the HR has actually somewhat fuller reverb due to the architecture of the reverb return. (The reverb circuit and also the impacts loop are solid state.) The HR has an extension speaker jack that supplies the 4-ohm speak tap ~ above the output transformer. The BD has actually this tap but it is not used (but could be added by a tech.)
In general these amps are similar. The BD will certainly not remain as clean at higher volumes as result of the 3rd stage always being active. The HR has "improved" distortion (drive) through "more drive" added. The HR has fuller reverb and also an expansion speaker jack. Both are good designs with plenty of standard Fender tone.

 

 

I simply picked up an enlarge HRDx and love it. I"ve scoured the website ns posted above -- good information.

 

Then again, I simply ordered this on Saturday - it may be something come consider...

 


I"ve used them both. I found that v the hot Rod, mine Les Paul to be a little bit muddy sounding and also the strat sounded an excellent with ample gain. V the Blues, the Les Paul sound to be superb and also the strat, although lacking a little bit of gain, sounded very nice and "tweed" like.

See more: Fontana Superior Court 17780 Arrow Blvd Fontana, Ca 92335, Fontana District

 

I just prefer the sound of the Blues Deluxe. To me that is a warmer sounding amp overall. That does have significantly less gain available than the warm Rod yet most world prefer to use pedals so i don"t know if the really matters.


Theme IPS Default (Default)Harmony central Alternate